All for Joomla All for Webmasters

 

ADA Consortium

ADA Consortium

The Wajir County Climate Change Fund Act, 2016
No. 3 of 2016
Date of Assent: 24th May 2016
Date of Commencement: 16th June 2016

Provision of easily accessible, timely and decision-relevant climate information can help society to cope with current climate variability and change; and in turn limit the economic and social damage caused by climate-related disasters. Climate Information Services (CIS) can also support society to build resilience to future climate change and take advantage of opportunities provided by favourable climate conditions. An effective CIS require adequate technical capacities and appropriate communication strategy that enables good exchange within information producers, translators, and user communities.

This initiative outlines a proposed framework for Makueni County Climate Information Services Plan (MCCISP) which aims to develop and deliver weather and climate information which can support local, sub-county and county-level decision making at time frames of hours, days, weeks, months, seasons and years in line with the county, national and international development frameworks including the County Integrated Development Plan (CIDP), Constitution of Kenya 2010, Kenya Vision 2030 and the National Climate Change Response Strategy (NCCRS) as well as the Global Framework for Climate Services (GFCS).

The plan recognizes that the delivery of Climate Information Service, which can effectively support decision making, requires the engagement of a wide range of stakeholders. Stakeholders of the MCCISP encompass: County Government Administration at county, sub-county, ward and village levels, County Ministry Departments across sectors together with their respective extension services, decentralized national Government agencies, religious leaders across different faith groups and denominations, local, community and livelihood associations, private sector bodies and national and international Public Benefit Organisations (PBOs) and universities and research institutions.

The County Climate Change Fund (CCCF) mechanism is an example of a new devolved climate fnance mechanism piloted by five county governments of Isiolo, Kitui, Makueni, Garissa and Wajir from 2013 to deliver climate finance from the national to local level.

The Adaptation Consortium conducted a learning exercise to gauge the effectiveness of the CCCF Mechanism to improve climate resilience in ASAL regions through investments in improved access to water that were identified and prioritised by the beneficiary communities. This briefing reports on the quantified economic values from surveys of householders, politicians, county and ward-level climate resilience committees. All respondents report better access to water for their livestock and household.

Benefits at household level every year were KES 14,170 (£109) per household far exceeding costs of implementation which were in total KES 3,640 (£28) per household. A large proportion of direct benefits accrue to women, who report shorter journeys (two hours less) to collect water for domestic use every day. These women are re-investing their time in family and households, business and girls into schoolwork. Inequality, untapped economic value and challenges from political succession and communication all need to be addressed to ensure sustainability of these investments. 

 

Climate Information Services (CIS) can inform decisions in the agriculture, water resources and other weather and climate sensitive sectors. This study aimed to evaluate the implementation, effectiveness, and sustainability of CIS in Makueni and Garissa Counties in Kenya, as a sample of the five counties that Ada Consortium project was implementing under the STARCK + PROJECT. The field surveys, farmers, pastoralists, key informants and the County Meteorological Office provided useful information that could improve the implementation and sustainability of CIS plans in the region. 

The assessment of the CIS implementation in these counties established that most users of CIS information in the two counties accessed daily, weekly, monthly and seasonal forecasts, with daily and seasonal forecasts being the most preferred. Most of the farmers said the CIS information was reliable, appropriate and effective and led to improved farm decisions such as when to plant, buy seeds, re-stock or migrate in search of pasture and water. Rainfall amount and onset dates were the most important CIS information sought by users in both counties while local FM stations were the most popular mode of accessing information and were viewed to be effective, reaching over 90% of the sampled population in both counties. 

Overall, more than 50% of the farmers from both counties said they benefitted from decisions they made based on CIS information. Some said they now plan better with CIS leading to minimal losses and better yields among other benefits. From the County Meteorological Offices, the current number of users of CIS in both regions is estimated at more than 50% of the total number of users. The CIS integration in County plans in Makueni has led to improved decisions in the short, medium and long-term projects, while in Garissa the CIS plan has not yet been fully implemented.

Several challenges to the implementation of CIS include lack of sufficient funding and infrastructure for dissemination of CIS to all potential users. It is therefore recommended that more resources be availed for capacity building of users of CIS in these regions to boost uptake of CIS and to increase meteorological observation stations in the region to improve the coverage and downscaling of climate forecasts to users at the village level. There is also a need to train more staff to improve technical support and dissemination of CIS to all potential users.

 

The County Climate Change Fund (CCCF) Mechanism has been pioneered by the Ada Consortium in five Counties in Kenya since 2012. The aim is to support the National Drought Management Authority’s Strategy Plan 2018-2022[1] which aims to enhance drought resilience and climate change adaptation. The approach is four-pronged – establishment of a County Climate change fund that enables communities to plan, implement and manage public good investments that enhances their resilience to climate change; establishing County- and Ward-level climate change planning committees; development of and integration of Climate Information Systems into adaptation at all political levels; and a Tracking Adaptation and Measuring Development framework. 

This report focuses on the first two. We seek to learn from the three most-advanced County pilots – in Isiolo, Makueni, and Wajir Counties – to enable efficient scale-up that delivers enhanced drought resilience and climate adaptation. We collected data from a range of stakeholders on the costs associated with implementing the CCCF Mechanism from Ada Consortium partners, surveyed 369 households, 30 key informants from County- and Ward-level Climate Planning Committees, and ran 30 focus group discussions at community- and Ward-level with a focus on gender groups and other potentially marginalised groups.

We find the CCCF Mechanism to be Value-for-Money (VfM), cost effective and delivering genuine impact. It strongly points to the potential for transformational change across the Arid and Semi Arid Lands (ASALs) landscape in Kenya, and beyond. However, the learning reported here must be taken into consideration, and learning itself better integrated, mainstreamed and standardised into all future CCCF Mechanism projects in Kenya, and beyond. Challenges include the lack of qualification and quantification of experience, which both limits learning and the scalability of the CCCF Mechanism, refinement of the existing operations, learning form the implementation, and understanding the precise impact on the ground. This report aims to provide some of the answers sought.

The level of investment by development partners in the CCCF Mechanism in the three Counties was £866, 387 since 2011. The investment per beneficiary is between £2.52 – 8.31 and by household between £18.18­ – 48.85.  These are minimum figures, and may omit investment in some aspects of the CCCF Mechanism by development partners (on development of the Climate Change Act), by both the Government of Kenya and County-level authorities (in supporting activities on climate change and rural economic development), and by communities (in decision-making, constructing, operating, delivering and governing projects that enhance climate change resilience).

The estimated level of direct economic value created by these changes is £3.1-3.2 million per annum. This is equivalent to an extra 10% of household income per annum. This is a minimum figure, and omits value created from direct and indirect benefits of climate change resilience uplift, access to water, recognition of community voices in policy processes and capacity built as part of the CCCF Mechanism – including management techniques and negotiation. Furthermore, indirect benefits may include reduced costs for some national investments, such as the National Drought Emergency Fund[2] and may be relevant to include.

Depending on how these projects progress we can expect these direct economic benefits to persist. Indeed, many projects are leveraging on the direct economic value created through the CCCF Mechanism as a catalyst for generating flows of indirect economic value in communities, with schools expanding, healthier herds, market gardens, Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs), and a range of other livelihood-enhancing activities reported.

Over 99% of respondents are positive about the CCCF Mechanism and the impact delivered by altering political processes and enabling improved management and access to water. Indeed, respondents report a series of economic, social, environmental and livelihood enabling benefits from the CCCF Mechanism.

There are a number of issues which need to be strengthened in the three Counties and integrated into plans to embed CCCF Mechanism in other Counties. These include: ensuring the roles of WCCPC and CCCPC members are fully understood, that inclusion is a focus, and critically that communication between County, Ward and Community is enhanced.

Some stakeholders are currently missing from the supply chain, and need to be integrated. Specifically the external private sector should be invited to understand how best to integrate their needs and willingness to participate in current and future CCCF Mechanism projects.

Our survey and approach here was constrained by time, and will be revised in future iterations. For instance, we were unable to ascertain how well the CCCF Mechanism works with other initiatives in the field. Clearly, this is a key factor for both national and county government and reporting on the complementarities the CCCF Mechanism brings to the devolution process.

Furthermore, we propose further learning is conducted to understand better how the Operational Fund is used; how communication can be improved among Counties, Ward and Communities; how to tailor the approach based on population density and other unique characteristics of Kenya’s Counties and Wards, to ensure delivery of drought resilience and climate adaptation.

[1] NDMA was established by Act in 2016 with the mandate to exercise overall coordination over all matters relating to drought management including implementation of policies and programmes relating to drought management. See more: http://www.ndma.go.ke/.

[2] NDEF is managed by the NDMA. See more here: GoK (2018).

These guidelines provide an overview of the County Climate Change Fund (CCCF) mechanism in Kenya. The mechanism is meant to facilitate channeling of climate finance to vulnerable communities through county governments. The primary objective of these guidelines is to inform county governments interested in establishing a devolved climate finance mechanism of the principles and components of the CCCF mechanism, and the process by which it may be established.

The guidelines consist of two sections: Section provides an introduction to the CCCF mechanism including its core principles, the four components and their design features; and Section II sets out the key steps for establishing the mechanism as well as the major cost drivers[1]. The guidelines are based on over 6 years’ experience of the Adaptation “Ada” Consortium’s work with the five county governments of Garissa, Isiolo, Kitui, Makueni and Wajir that jointly covers 29% of Kenya’s land area and approximately 4 million people.

It is informed by over 82 community prioritised public good investments funded at a cost of £7.4M. Even though the design features were largely informed by the dryland context in which the work was piloted, it is expected to evolve as the work is scaled out to new agro-ecological zones and socio-economic contexts in Kenya. Key achievements that the toolkit is drawing lessons from include the enactment of CCCF legislation at county level that improved coordination of climate change activities and ensured budgetary allocation, development of county Climate Information Services (CIS) plans for enhanced access and use of climate information and, investment in priority adaptation interventions across the counties that contributes to resilience building.     

 

[1] A more detailed step by step guidance that includes training and reference materials is in preparation. 

The Constitution of Kenya (CoK) 2010 profoundly encourages transparency and accountability in governance with signature emphasis on bottom-up approach and bestowing immense powers on the citizens on holding duty bearers accountable through various progressive provisions.  Devolution particularly embodies the transformative CoK 2010’s bottom-up approach of governance in Kenya. Through devolution, a number of milestones have been realized and lives transformed especially in the marginalized regions like Northern parts of Kenya hitherto promulgation of the constitution.

Despite notable devolution milestones, corruption remains one of the greatest threats towards realization of the promise of devolution (TI-Kenya; 2014&2015). Social accountability mechanisms are very key tools that citizens can use in performing their oversight function for efficient and effective service delivery. Section 24 of The Climate Change Act 2016, provides for Public engagement and the climate change Council is mandated to prepare and publish a public engagement strategy after every twelve months.

The strategy should set out the steps that it intends to take to inform the public about climate change action plans and encourage the public to contribute to the achievement of the objectives of those action plans. The act Provides for the public engagement strategy to identify actions which the public may take to contribute to the achievement of the purposes.Through the Climate Change Act, 2016 mandates all the County Governments powers to mainstream all climate change actions in the various sectors. 

In performance of its functions, a county Government shall integrate and mainstream climate change actions, interventions and duties set out in this Act, and the National Climate Change Action Plan into various sectors. The Counties are the required to report on climate actions to the County Assemblies then to the Ministry/Council and the National Assembly to highlight the accountability mechanism. The Climate Change Fund thereby established as a financing mechanism for priority climate change actions and interventions approved by climate change Council. The Fund is vested in the National Treasury and monies appropriated from the Consolidated Fund by an Act of Parliament.

Kenya being a developing nation whose economy depends on climate sensitive natural resources, and due to her geographic positioning, all her sectors are vulnerable to climate change and its impacts. Although Kenya having become middle income country, climate change challenges increases the cost of development. Growth in all sectors have to take a low carbon, climate resilient development pathway. To achieve this, Kenyan actors need to access appropriate cutting edge technology, build capacity of its institutions and actors, as well as facilitate access to financing to enable various actors play their respective roles.

These require additional funding over and above the normal development agenda. Cognizant of the importance of social accountability mechanisms in the implementation of Climate Funds, Adaptation Consortium (ADA) has commissioned a review of relevant social accountability mechanisms through this report with a view of exploring opportunities for strengthening the County Climate Change Funds governance for effective utilization of the resources through citizen-led initiatives.

The Report therefore details a brief about the project, review of the social accountability mechanisms providing both threats and opportunities of various tools in reference to various stakeholders. The report also identifies a number of good practices from ongoing work of ADA as well as from other parts of the World for replication. 

 

Recognition of the potential for climate information to support sustainable development, enhance preparedness, protect lives and support production has greatly increased. This has led to a growing focus on developing climate information and services that can better support decision making at all levels, including at national, county and sub-county levels, amongst those people whose lives and livelihoods are directly impacted by climate.

In Kenya, the decentralisation of meteorological services has afforded an opportunity to develop climate services tailored to the specific and different needs of each County. In support of this process, the Kenya Meteorological Department (KMD) has developed a framework for coproducing County Climate Information Service (CIS) Plans together with key stakeholders from across County Government, technical services and agencies, livelihood and social groups.

Through building an understanding of the specific types of climate information that decision makers need, when they need the information, what format and language they need it to be provided in, and when and how they need to receive it, the County CIS Plan maps out how climate information can best support the people in the County in addressing the climate-related, socio-economic challenges that they face. The development of the County CIS Plan was initiated by the Adaptation Consortium in 2013, when plans for five arid and semi-arid Counties were developed.

The County CIS Plan approach was adopted by KMD and subsequently scaled up within the Weather and Climate Information Services for Africa (WISER) programme’s Decentralised Climate Information Services for Decision Making in Western Kenya (WISER Western) project for nine counties in the Lake Victoria region. Based on learning developed through these two projects, both funded by the UK Government Department for International Development (DfID), this toolkit aims to 

(a) Support scaling-up within Kenya, to develop a County CIS Plan for each County, and

(b) Document and share transferable learning on the process to support complementary initiatives seeking to develop decentralised climate services in the region and more widely.

This toolkit maps out six key steps in the process of developing a sub-state climate information services plan:

  1. Understanding the roles of National Meteorological and Hydrological Services (NMHS) staff supporting decentralized climate services
  2. Undertaking a technical assessment of existing observation networks and data sources and reviewing the current development and communication of climate information products.
  3. Identifying the climate information needs of key stakeholders across County Administration and amongst the County’s principal livelihood groups
  4. Drafting the County CIS Plan
  5. Reviewing and finalising the County CIS Plan with key stakeholders and planning implementation, monitoring, evaluation and regular review of the County CIS Plan
  6. Implementing the plan.

Each step is supported by a module comprising an introductory overview, followed with one or more practical exercises and approaches through which the County Directors of Meteorological Services (CDMS), or NHMS staff supporting decentralized services, can gather the information required to complete the County-specific, or local, input required. The exercises and approaches are illustrated with examples drawn from the development of County CIS Plans from across a range of Kenyan Counties.

The toolkit is designed to be used in conjunction with a template that includes both generic text, appropriate for all County contexts, and highlights areas which require County-specific input. Use of the toolkit in another country requires the development of a complementary template for developing decentralized climate services.

Kenya developed and launched its frst fve-year National Climate Change Action Plan (NCCAP) in 2013 as a tool to enhance adaptation to climate change and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The NCCAP 2013-2017 plan set out 38 priority actions to help the country transition to a low carbon climate resilient development pathway.Nine actions were completed by April 2018, seven did not progress, and 22 are in progress and will carry over to the second NCCAP (2018-2022).

Signifcant progress was made under the frst NCCAP 2013-2017. This includes the development of the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) 2015-2030; establishment of climate change funds to support adaptation actions in fve ASAL counties; expansion of renewable energy, including geothermal, solar and wind; establishment of the National Climate Change Resource Centre; and improvement of the legal and policy framework.

This will include the Climate Change Act, 2016; National Climate Change Framework Policy; and National Climate Finance Policy.

Ecosystem-based adaptation (EbA) integrates the use of biodiversity and ecosystem services into an overall climate change adaptation strategy.

Globally, EbA projects are increasing in number, and experience to date suggests that EbA holds great potential to increase local resilience and adaptive capacity, especially for the poorest and most vulnerable communities. Evidence is largely case study-based and often anecdotal, however. Better consolidated, comparative evidence regarding EbA effectiveness would help policy makers make more informed choices about how best to design and implement climate change responses (such as National Adaptation Plans). This chapter outlines a recently developed question-based framework developed to qualitatively assess EbA effectiveness.

It describes some early observations from framework application in five countries and outlines potential and emerging institutional and political challenges and opportunities to realizing the benefits of EbA on the ground in these five countries.

Click here to read more.

The Isiolo County Climate Change Fund Act, 2018

THE ISIOLO COUNTY CLIMATE CHANGE FUND ACT, 2018

An Act of the County Assembly of Isiolo for the establishment of a Climate Change Fund to finance, facilitate and coordinate financing Climate Change Adaption and Mitigation projects; and for connected purposes
ENACTED
by the County Assembly of Isiolo.

THE PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT ACT, 2012 (No. 18 of 2012)

IN EXERCISE of the powers conferred by Section 116 of the Public Finance Management Act number 18 of 2012, the Kitui County Executive Committee Member for the time being responsible for County Treasury makes the following Regulations: -

The Public Finance Management Act (Kitui County Climate Change Fund) Regulations, 2018.

This is an Act of the Garissa County Assembly for the establishment of a Climate Change Fund for facilitating community initiated Climate Change Adaption and Mitigation projects; and for connected purposes;

The object of this Act is to create a fund in the County for the purpose of facilitating Climate Finance in the County for:-

  1. Establishing Climate Finance mechanisms in the County;
  2. Facilitating planning for Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation in the county planning and budgetary framework
  3. Seeking and receiving grants from international sources, the National Government, the County Government and other organizations
  4. Initiating and coordinating Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation frameworks at the community level in the County;
  5. Facilitating community initiated Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation activities in the County; and
  6. Coordinating support from National Government Climate Change policy and legislative framework

Kenya is frequently affected by weather-related disasters, particularly droughts and floods. Drought occurs cyclically and historically it has affected Kenya’s economy more significantly than floods. Recurrent droughts have destroyed livelihoods, triggered local conflicts over scarce resources and eroded the ability of communities to cope. Heavy rainfall during the season causes flash floods which mostly affect urbanised areas.

Kenya Meteorological Department has given climate information for many years but the uptake has been limited due to a number of reasons. Most of these reasons revolve around i) relevancy and content of the climate information services, ii) the channels of communication, and iii) understanding of the climate information given to the public.

This initiative outlines a proposed framework for Isiolo County Climate Information Services Plan (ICCISP) which aims to develop and deliver weather and climate information which can support local, sub-county and county-level decision making at time frames of hours, days, weeks, months, seasons and years in line with the County, national and international development frameworks including the County Integrated Development Plan (CIDP), Constitution of Kenya 2010, Kenya Vision 2030 and the National Climate Change Response Strategy (NCCRS) as well as the Global Framework for Climate Services (GFCS).

The Climate Information Services (CIS) Plan aims to support society to build resilience to future climate change and take advantage of opportunities provided by favourable climate conditions.

Kenya is frequently affected by weather and climate related disasters, particularly droughts and floods. Drought occurs cyclically and historically they have affected Kenya’s economy more significantly than floods.Recurrent droughts have destroyed livelihoods, triggered local conflicts over scarce resources and eroded the ability of communities to cope with the vagaries of climate change. Heavy rainfall during the season causes flash floods and more localized, mostly affecting urbanised areas.

Kenya Meteorological Department has provided climate information for many years but the uptake has been limited due to several reasons. Most of these reasons revolve around 

  1. Relevance and content of the climate information services,
  2. The channels of communication, and
  3. Understanding of the climate information given to users

Climate variability and change are affecting millions of poor people in Kenya, particularly in arid and semi-arid lands. Significant investments are being made in developing Climate Information Services (CIS) which are tailored to the needs of pastoralists and agro-pastoralists and aim to help them adapt to the impact of climate change in these regions. Recent research has found that a new category of ultra-poor are falling out of dominant pastoralist and agro-pastoralist livelihoods and they are unable to beneft from CIS. To improve the impact of CIS, Kenya’s county governments should put more focus on: (a) adopting an equity lens for the integration of CIS in county planning processes, so as to better reach those outside dominant livelihoods types, and (b) improving the understanding of constraints and enabling conditions for the poor in accessing and using CIS within both mainstream and alternative livelihoods systems.

The CIS Plan aims to develop a strategy or a framework for providing climate services at the county level with the user’s needs in mind.

The implementation of this framework will depend heavily on partnering with all those organisations and individuals whose activity will suffer due to extreme weather and climate impacts.

The new constitution of Kenya (GoK, 2010) offers the opportunity for services to be moved closer to the citizens at the county and sub-county (constituency) or community/grassroots levels. This opportunity, in turn, calls for a concerted effort by KMD to strengthen its infrastructure and services to reach and have the desired influence upon the community or grassroots level of society, where the most severe impacts of climate variability and climate change are realized.

The potential benefits from enhancing the quality and use of meteorological, climate and hydrological information and products in decision-making are enormous, but realizing these benefits will require improvement in infrastructure, human resources development and engagement between providers and users to improve the process for decision- making and to realise social and economic benefits.

This CIS Plan therefore aims to develop a strategy or a framework for providing climate services at the county level with the user’s needs in mind. The implementation of this framework will depend heavily on partnering with all those organisations and individuals whose activity will suffer due to extreme weather and climate impacts.

Weather and climate have direct influence and impact on human comfort, socio-economic activities and the natural environment. Over the years, humans have altered natural ecosystems through various activities leading to modified local and regional climates. Today, human influence on the physical environment at a global scale is depicted by rapid increase in population size, energy consumption, intensity of land use, international trade and travel, and other human activities. The resulting global change have heightened awareness that the long-term good health of populations depends on the continued stability and functioning of the biosphere's ecological, physical, and socio-economic systems.

There is no doubt that the vagaries of weather and climate play a critical role in shaping Africa’s development agenda. This requires a collective approach, unity of purpose based upon the shared vision on climate proofing, genuine partnerships and commitment. National Meteorological and Hydrological Services (NMHSs) and Societies are critical actors in supporting sustainable development. Although there is today, increased awareness of the socio-economic benefits derived from weather and climate services, there is still a need to enhance the uptake of scientific knowledge within our society. Information exchange and public education are some of the interventions that can help attain this goal.

There is, therefore, need for various stakeholders to have a forum to share various findings and engage on the role of weather, climate and environmental research in achieving sustainable development. It is with this in mind that the Kenya Meteorological Society (KMS), with the support of National Drought Management Authority (NDMA), Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD), World Meteorological Organization (WMO), Kenya Meteorological Department (KMD), United Nations Educational, Social and Cultural Organization/Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (UNESCO/IOC), organized the 12th KMS International Conference.

 

 

 

Multi-billion dollar opportunity for county-level public investment

The establishment of the UN’s Green Climate Fund (GCF) offers the potential for county and national governments to access significant financial resources to support investments in adaptation and mitigation. The GCF will come online in 2015, and aims to be running at full capacity by 2020, with resources of $100bn per year. 50% of these funds will be earmarked specifically for adaptation projects. The GCF will function in addition to pre-existing multilateral and bilateral climate funds.

At present, operational funds for adaptation in Kenya include the UN Adaptation Fund, due to begin direct disbursements to Kenyan implementers in the near future, DFID’s International Climate Fund ($13.5m), and the World Bank’s Special Climate Change Fund ($6.5m). The projects have a broad focus, including spending on disaster risk reduction, water infrastructure, and arid lands development.

From 2007-2013, Kenya was the second largest recipient of climate finance in Sub Saharan Africa, having been allocated $457.8m, most of which was dedicated to development of the national energy grid. So far, $42.12m has been earmarked specifically for adaptation projects. This represents 1.23% of the $3.4bn allocated for adaptation worldwide.

If Kenya were to maintain this level of access to international climate finance when the Green Climate Fund reaches full capacity, it stands to receive $615m in finance for climate adaptation each year. If it were to double its level of access, it could stand to gain $1.2bn each year. Pre-established county level funds could prove to be versatile mechanisms through which to channel this funding to support community driven development and resilience building priorities.

The Challenge

At the international level, global flows of climate finance are increasing – amounting to approximately USD 360 billion in 20121. The establishment of the Green Climate Fund (GCF) and its commitment to direct 50% of its anticipated annual fund of USD100bn by 2020 to vulnerable countries for climate change adaptation offers significant opportunities. The GCF will function in addition to pre-existing multi–lateral and bi-lateral climate funds. Climate vulnerable countries, such as Kenya, that demonstrates capacity to channel these funds to the most vulnerable and drive climate resilient economic growth, while demonstrating strong fiduciary standards, will be well-placed to access global climate finance.

Pre-established county level funds could prove to be versatile mechanisms through which to channel this funding to sup- port community driven development and resilience building priorities. Their devolved nature could also make them preferred mechanisms for direct access to fund disbursements, supporting the country driven focus of the fund. Access to such funds will be in accordance with the Kenyan constitution (2010) which grants county government’s authority and responsibility for developing the social and economic aspects of their county according to local priorities. The Adaptation Consortium in Kenya is addressing this challenge.

The Devolved Climate Finance

The Adaptation Consortium (Ada) is helping to strengthen the institutional arrangements that will enable climate finance from the Green Climate Fund and other sources to ow through the National Drought Management Authority to Arid and Semi Arid Lands (ASALs) counties. The County Climate Adaptation fund set up by the Consortium enables the prioritization of adaptation investments by vulnerable communities through representative ward-level institutions.

Initially piloted in Isiolo County, the approach is now being implemented in four other ASAL counties of Garissa, Kitui, Makueni and Wajir which in total cover approximately 29% of Kenya’s land area and a population of 4 million plus. At the end of the project in 2017, it is expected that 2.5 million people will be supported to cope with climate change through provision of climate information, while 800,000 people will bene t directly from adaptation investments.